Thursday 11 September 2025 17:22:41 1757629361

I was going to write something on the anniversay of a day that lives in infamy for more than the primary reason. Whatever the intentions of the Bush administration it marked the beginning of the biggest debacle since the Vietnam War. The only consolation if there is one is that there were fewer deaths. I was young enough when it started not to be aware but by the time it ended I was quite old enough to be disgusted by it. Before I got around to thinking about it much a couple of other things happened. At twenty-four years what more can be said? Terrorism still happens regularly, much of it here in the U.S.A. but the casualties of illegals and that other persistent menace are more numerous than victims of terrorism although some terrorism is by legal inhabitants.

A few weeks ago a member of the latter group committed yet another horrific killing of a good and decent human being. I believe Alex covered that adequately. I didn't watch the later-released full video. That first few seconds were enough - a beautiful young woman being assaulted by that monstrous thing... I didn't sleep well. Then yesterday it got worse. Much worse.

Like most people I know I was at my computer all day and into the night. I was as usual listening to the Clay and Buck show when they broke the news and it would be several hours before it was announced that Charlie Kirk had died. I'm just a couple of years older than Charlie. At this point the killer remains at large and I am uneasy. Whether he has escaped or is hiding somewhere it suggests that he has help. The only bright spot at this point is that it won't be sanitized as was the Butler attempt on President Trump. This time there will be no destruction or concealment of evidence by the government and all that can be known will be. And while I can make a 200 yard shot with my relative inexperience it is by no means easy so it wasn't some random crazy person.

For some reason I can see someone being cute here. More tranny stuff on the rifle and/or ammo is a little too convenient given the recent tranny assassins. A bolt-action suggests someone more professional - no word on the scope but making that shot without one seems rather improbable. If it's a Remington 700 in .308 I would be very suspicious. Naturally the FBI is not letting out much and that's a good thing. As for fingerprints or DNA being on the gun that would be sloppy for a pro but so would discarding it where it could be found so quickly is too. So one wonders if the guy running away with the rifle was the shooter. Or did the shot come from somewhere close by? Whether or not the bullet was recovered is as yet unknown or undisclosed. Color me suspicious.

Alex@MyndCryme

Friday 12 September 2025 16:53:22 1757714002

This went on into the night again. Eventually we learned what may be the truth. How much of the truth remains to be seen - it appears that the killer has been identified. Will we ever know whether he was one of a number of weapons prepared and pointed at the target at the right time?

It seems that the actual shooter (not a JER or LHO decoy) may be the one the caught. At least this time the FBI will not be destroying/concealing evidence as at Butler. Some of what I've heard is enocouraging - that a forensic deep dive into the shooter's digital past will be conducted. But will they go beyond the usual Facebook, Instagram and other generic platforms? Discord has been mentioned and may well be a factor. I'd like to know if someone or multiple someones pushed and prodded him until he did it.

Alex@MyndCryme
It seems that the "tranny" stuff on the rifle and cartridges was not there - just "antifa" stuff so this guy could be organic to the degree that he was homegrown and only needed to be pointed at the target. If he was a decoy and a real shooter was somewhere nearby the FBI would most likely have found it by now.

MAGAHurtz@MyndCryme

Some time ago, it seems like ages, I compared President Trump to Paul Atreides. Entering the arena knowing - from his imperfect oracular vision - that he might die but knowing that if he died the jihad would go on without him because of the legend he had become. If Donald Trump had lost the election and ended up in prison would a 'jihad' have been waged against the corrupt regime? I can see it but it would have been ugly.

Had Trump not succeeded in being elected again I suspect we would have entered a dark period in the history of the Republic. A few more mass arrests and killings of citizens and there would be retaliation. Not resistance at first but retaliation. Like McVeigh for Waco and Ruby Ridge. Once the regime was exposed as powerless against a latter-day version of the Viet Cong the struggle might be protracted - or not - but the loser would never be in doubt. Trump being elected again gave us a reprieve.

Alex@MyndCryme
Charlie was assassinated at the first event on the American Comeback tour. He knew that there were people who hated him, people who hated and feared him. He would have known the risk he was taking. But he went, as Donald Trump entered the arena, like Paul Atreides knowing that a possible outcome was his death and knowing of the capacity for treachery of his enemy. Charlie died and that hurts. His beautiful wife and children - too young now to know why and now but will grow up without a father - make this crime worse. But I know that he is with the good guys, with Abraham and Lazarus and Rush and painful as the death of those we love is we know:
For to me, to live is Christ and to die is gain. If I am to go on living in the body, this will mean fruitful labor for me. Yet what shall I choose? I do not know! I am torn between the two: I desire to depart and be with Christ, which is better by far; but it is more necessary for you that I remain in the body.

Philipians 1:21-24
Charlie has departed and is with Christ but as Obi-Wan Kenobi said "if you strike me down I shall become more powerful than you can imagine." OK, a little SF if not mythology but Jesus emerged more powerful than His enemies could ever have imagined. It would be seven centuries before Satan realized how bad it was and still fails.

The usual references to the assassinations of the Kennedys and Martin Luther King have been made but I don't see a similarity. The Kennedys were political figures and JFK wasn't around long enough to have much of a legacy. The Bay of Pigs and missile crisis debacles tell us little - Kennedy was probably as much a victim of his handlers as were the Bushes and to some degree Reagan. Why he was removed and who did it and why remains a mystery to most and perhaps someone somewhere knows the truth. MLK was the most prominent symbol of a phase in American history and however and why he was removed is probably almost as complicated as the removal of JFK. If the movement begun by Charlie Kirk becomes something even bigger with his death he may well become more iconic than any politician other than President Trump.